Sounds & Looks just like a sealed record.a record with virtually no sign of use, a "hot off the press feel.only a faint sign of ownership, and is a record that feels has been played 4-10times, and well maintained.a record that plays well with extremely minor noise, or faint crackle. may have a bit of scuffing, some age, maybe some discoloration but will play alright.a VG record is in decent playable condition, ( light noise, and crackle.but wont skip).Edit Release All Versions of this Release New Submission. 2nd worst rating so dont get your hopes up. Label:Harvest 14C 062-04550, Harvest 2J 062-04550: Format: Vinyl, LP, Album, Reissue."Good" is a record that will have many noise, scratch, skips, and is a relic.It will be the first copy you get your hands on in any "Vinyl Hunt" and sometimes they become decor pieces, or end up being used for anything other than playing/listening. Having a Poor graded record isnt the end of the world. This vinyl will be scratched, and skip when played, and has been abused.Our "Previously Loved" Record Grading Is as follows: "It's not anything that would be a spoiler for the original at all, it's an interesting add-on to the thing.Liquid error (sections/header line 85): Could not find asset snippets/currencies-switcher.liquid “I to and said, 'Annoyingly, it's absolutely brilliant!' It was and is," Mason admitted. The drummer was sent a copy of the re-imagined album and liked what he heard. Mason, for his part, was impressed with Waters’ new version of The Dark Side of the Moon. “But it is a way for the 79-year-old man to look back across the intervening 50 years into the eyes of the 29-year and say, to quote a poem of mine about my father, ‘We did our best, we kept his trust, our dad would have been proud of us.’ And also it is a way for me to honor a recording that Nick and Rick and Dave and I have every right to be very proud of.” “It's not a replacement for the original, which, obviously, is irreplaceable,” Waters explained on Facebook. So … blah!”Ī month later, he was more candid regarding the project. “Of course, we were a band, there were four of us, we all contributed – but it’s my project and I wrote it. Let’s get rid of all this ‘we’ crap!” Waters declared. In the accompanying interview, Waters was preemptively defensive of the project, understanding that some would question his desire to rerecord such a timeless album. The project first came to light in February when Waters gave The Telegraph a preview of the reworked songs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |